IANA wrote: The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is in Last Call: , and has the following comments with regards to the publication of this document: We understand this document to have no IANA Actions. Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this document. Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and publication of your document. --------- Jari Arkko responds to IANA: That's right. This document does not have any IANA considerations or actions, mainly because they have been treated in the companion document draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-20.txt. However, to make this clearer I'll add an empty "IANA Considerations" section and statement about it to the document. Ok? --------- IANA responds to Jari Arkko: It is not required to add an IANA Considerations section if there are no IANA actions, but if you would like to, that's fine! --------- Francis Dupont responds to Jari Arkko: According to ID-nits, the IANA section is required only when there is an action for IANA which is not the case here. --------- Gabriel Montenegro responds to Jari Arkko: > Should I keep it or remove it... hmmm. Why not? Similar considerations resulted in my adding this section to rfc3481:
This specification requires no IANA actions.
---------